|| Breaking News ||

NatParUSA has many more saved articles, information, and resources available that are not currently linked by default- If you're looking for something in particular that we may have on our domain, type it in the box below:


NatParUSA Contributing Authors

Cassandra Atkins

Jim Betker

Patrick Buchanan

D.A. Hänks

You

J. David Peterson

Tim Stillwell

Win Vanderstyne

Bob Whitaker

Josef Wolfgang

 

_______________

Patriot Act- by D.A. Hänks

"Hate Speech"

Internet Radio

Lindbergh's Observations

Does Race Matter?

South African Crisis

 


This site is dedicated to the Nationalist Movement in the United States. If you are interested in finding the Nationalist Party in YOUR own Country, or the Nationalist movement that best represents YOUR people, please click HERE

 

 


 

The FOUNDING principle of our Nationalist Party* is the belief that our Country is analogous to living and breathing organism – and that organism has been ailing for the last 50 years. Our unique Western Culture and European peoples are becoming diluted, and there exists the need for a re-affirmation of the principles followed by our Founding Fathers. The Nationalist will reject "Multiculturalism" in all its sordid forms.

*The Nationalist Party, U.S.A. is in no way affiliated with the "Nationalist Movement" that is advocated by the Crosstar organization. (www.Nationalist.org)

We believe that our military is wrongly being used as both an Empire-Building machine for the Neoconservative Republicans and were recently used as a "Global Police Force" during past Democratic administrations.  Both are a treasonous misuse of our Sons and Daughters, the defenders of the U.S.A.

     

A good portion of our armed forces should be patrolling our border with Mexico, in order to stop the inflow of slave-laborers that threaten our precious Homeland, and enable Global agricultural corporations to reap an outrageous net profit. A profit that is not currently being re-invested, in healthcare as it SHOULD be, for the workforce of Men and Women who are the backbone of the United States.

 

A word from the Headquarters:

Welcome to the Nationalist Party, USA’s website. If you’re anything like me, you can be described as an American who is fed up with our [now failed] two-party system that rules these United States. NatParUSA was founded on the principle that this system of rule by the elite MUST END. Whenever a Country is controlled by those individuals with monetary influence in the form of “Political Action Committees,” there is brought forth a need for change.

The two major political parties, the Democrats and Republicans, would have you believe that these PACs are simply groups of people who have come together with an agenda for change regarding some issue- This is NOT the case. 95% of Political Action Committees serve the corporate cause! PACs are given quaint names like “Taxpayers for Congressional Justice”, when, in actuality, the PAC is a group of CORPORATIONS looking to lower their own taxes, and increase their profit margin (All of this while those said corporations are re-locating [“outsourcing”] to third-world Countries to, once again, increase the profit margin).

If these practices were being used to increase the average U.S. worker’s income, they might be justified. However, the corporate giants are selling the souls of our workers out for the almighty dollar. Shame on them- and when they fall, as ALL corrupt organizations eventually will, these corporations will have to answer to The People.

 
 
Jess David Peterson

Founder, Nationalist Party, USA

E-Mail Comments to: NatParUSA@cox.net

 

 

Look at what is happening in America over the last few weeks: Click Below, and Watch the video....

     

  Watch this to understand WHY America is on the slide down to Hell

The Death of a Republic, and the Birth of an Empire - By John Emery

Featured commentary by Rusty Mason- Merging the US, Canada & Mexico

Featured commentary by Jimmy King- The First Mexican-American War, and What it Means to the Current Immigration Debate

Click Below and Sign the petition!

The Black Eye of Domestic Violence'Hate crime' victims: Young, poor, White 

More Hate Speech

 My House Fell Down Today

White Nationalism... Are you Supremacists?

Environmentalism - A Nationalist View

England- 2020

 

                               

 

 A "Treasure-trove" of movies for the Nationalist- Yggdrasil's Movie List



 

 

 

 

 

 

Poll: Most in U.S. Oppose Population Growth
 

Voters prefer reduced immigration over adding another 100 million

by Roy Beck

Passing the 300-million milestone for U.S. population this month apparently is no cause for celebration for the majority of American voters.

A survey of 1,000 likely voters nationally, conducted Sep. 18-24 by The Polling Company/Woman Trend reveals great discomfort about the rapid U.S. population growth being caused by federal immigration policies.

The poll raises intriguing questions about the political calculations of most U.S. Senators and President Bush, who have been trying to increase the rate of immigration and U.S. population growth this year.

66% of likely American voters believe the population growth being caused by the present level of immigration will “negatively impact the quality of life in America, such as causing more congestion, overcrowding and pollution,” according to the poll.

The Census Bureau projects that, if current immigration rates are allowed to continue, the country will add well over 100 million additional residents by mid-century, with most of the growth caused by immigration.

Voters were asked how the quality of life where they live would be changed if their community’s population were to grow at the same rate (one-third) as is expected for the nation under current immigration rates. The majority of American voters overwhelmingly say it would worsen their quality of life. This is true for:

•Hispanics: By a 6-1 ratio, they say quality of life where they live would be made worse rather than made better by such population growth.



• Blacks: By a 9-1 ratio, they fear worse over better (about the same as the 9 ½ -1 ratio for Whites).

•All Political Affiliations: Democrats expect the population growth will make things worse over better by 7-1. The ratio is 10-1 for Independents, and 14-1 for Republicans.

•Every Region of the Country: The survey divided the United States into nine regions. Regardless of the population density, voters in each region appear to much prefer their current level of population over significantly more growth. Not surprisingly, voters in the congested Mid-Atlantic states say one-third more growth would make the quality of life worse over better by a 13-1 ratio. But even voters in the northern Great Plains say worse over better by a 10-1 ratio.

The poll results suggest the possibility of an interesting reception for many U.S. Senators as they return to their home states to campaign for re-election.

The majority of Senators voted in May to more than double current immigration rates – which would dramatically increase the rate of population growth even higher. (The House of Representatives, however, refused to consider the immigration increases.)

The Senators’ immigration bill would have forced a level of population growth that the poll shows almost no Americans prefer.

• According to the poll, fewer than 12% of voters think even current population growth rates would improve their quality of life – whether they are professionals, white-collar or blue-collar workers, whether they have part-time jobs or no jobs. This is also true regardless of the voter’s age, income or marital status.

There simply is no real voting constituency for the kind of forced population growth being sought by the majority of Democrats and minority of Republicans in the U.S. Senate and by the Republican White House, based on the poll results.

In fact, the poll indicates that two-thirds of Americans would prefer that Congress reduce population growth by reducing annual immigration numbers – the opposite of the Senate’s attempts this year.

Who in America supports increasing immigration (and thus population growth) as do the majority of U.S. Senators?

The poll asked this question: “If immigration continues at its current level for the next 50 years, experts estimate that it will add approximately 100 million people to the United States population, which currently is 300 million. Knowing this, would you say the country needs to reduce the number of immigrants entering the U.S., increase the number of immigrants entering the U.S., or keep the number of immigrants entering the U.S. the same?”

• Only 3% of all likely voters say they support increasing the number of immigrants, in response to that question.
 

read the rest of the story
 

 

 

 

Zion's "War on Terror"

Click Banner Below for an In-depth explanation of the REAL reason that our United States military is in Iraq:

 

The Secret Letter From Iraq

A Marine's letter home, with its frank description of life in "Dante's inferno," has been circulating through generals' in-boxes. We publish it here with the author's approval.

Written last month, this straightforward account of life in Iraq by a Marine officer was initially sent just to a small group of family and friends. His honest but wry narration and unusually frank dissection of the mission contrasts sharply with the story presented by both sides of the Iraq war debate, the Pentagon spin masters and fierce critics. Perhaps inevitably, the "Letter from Iraq" moved quickly beyond the small group of acquaintances and hit the inboxes of retired generals, officers in the Pentagon, and staffers on Capitol Hill. TIME's Sally B. Donnelly first received a copy three weeks ago but only this week was able to track down the author and verify the document's authenticity. The author wishes to remain anonymous but has allowed us to publish it here — with a few judicious omissions.

All: I haven't written very much from Iraq. There's really not much to write about. More exactly, there's not much I can write about because practically everything I do, read or hear is classified military information or is depressing to the point that I'd rather just forget about it, never mind write about it. The gaps in between all of that are filled with the pure tedium of daily life in an armed camp. So it's a bit of a struggle to think of anything to put into a letter that's worth reading. Worse, this place just consumes you. I work 18-20-hour days, every day. The quest to draw a clear picture of what the insurgents are up to never ends. Problems and frictions crop up faster than solutions. Every challenge demands a response. It's like this every day. Before I know it, I can't see straight, because it's 0400 and I've been at work for 20 hours straight, somehow missing dinner again in the process. And once again I haven't written to anyone. It starts all over again four hours later. It's not really like Ground Hog Day, it's more like a level from Dante's Inferno.

Rather than attempting to sum up the last seven months, I figured I'd just hit the record-setting highlights of 2006 in Iraq. These are among the events and experiences I'll remember best.

Worst Case of Déjà Vu — I thought I was familiar with the feeling of déjà vu until I arrived back here in Fallujah in February. The moment I stepped off of the helicopter, just as dawn broke, and saw the camp just as I had left it ten months before — that was déjà vu. Kind of unnerving. It was as if I had never left. Same work area, same busted desk, same chair, same computer, same room, same creaky rack, same... everything. Same everything for the next year. It was like entering a parallel universe. Home wasn't 10,000 miles away, it was a different lifetime.

Most Surreal Moment — Watching Marines arrive at my detention facility and unload a truck load of flex-cuffed midgets. 26 to be exact. We had put the word out earlier in the day to the Marines in Fallujah that we were looking for Bad Guy X, who was described as a midget. Little did I know that Fallujah was home to a small community of midgets, who banded together for support since they were considered as social outcasts. The Marines were anxious to get back to the midget colony to bring in the rest of the midget suspects, but I called off the search, figuring Bad Guy X was long gone on his short legs after seeing his companions rounded up by the giant infidels.

Most Profound Man in Iraq — an unidentified farmer in a fairly remote area who, after being asked by Reconnaissance Marines if he had seen any foreign fighters in the area replied "Yes, you."

Worst City in al-Anbar Province — Ramadi, hands down. The provincial capital of 400,000 people. Lots and lots of insurgents killed in there since we arrived in February. Every day is a nasty gun battle. They blast us with giant bombs in the road, snipers, mortars and small arms. We blast them with tanks, attack helicopters, artillery, our snipers (much better than theirs), and every weapon that an infantryman can carry. Every day. Incredibly, I rarely see Ramadi in the news. We have as many attacks out here in the west as Baghdad. Yet, Baghdad has 7 million people, we have just 1.2 million. Per capita, al-Anbar province is the most violent place in Iraq by several orders of magnitude. I suppose it was no accident that the Marines were assigned this area in 2003.

Bravest Guy in al-Anbar Province — Any Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technician (EOD Tech). How'd you like a job that required you to defuse bombs in a hole in the middle of the road that very likely are booby-trapped or connected by wire to a bad guy who's just waiting for you to get close to the bomb before he clicks the detonator? Every day. Sanitation workers in New York City get paid more than these guys. Talk about courage and commitment.

Second Bravest Guy in al-Anbar Province — It's a 20,000-way tie among all these Marines and Soldiers who venture out on the highways and through the towns of al-Anbar every day, not knowing if it will be their last — and for a couple of them, it will be.

Worst E-Mail Message — "The Walking Blood Bank is Activated. We need blood type A+ stat." I always head down to the surgical unit as soon as I get these messages, but I never give blood — there's always about 80 Marines in line, night or day.

Biggest Surprise — Iraqi Police. All local guys. I never figured that we'd get a police force established in the cities in al-Anbar. I estimated that insurgents would kill the first few, scaring off the rest. Well, insurgents did kill the first few, but the cops kept on coming. The insurgents continue to target the police, killing them in their homes and on the streets, but the cops won't give up. Absolutely incredible tenacity. The insurgents know that the police are far better at finding them than we are — and they are finding them. Now, if we could just get them out of the habit of beating prisoners to a pulp...

Greatest Vindication — Stocking up on outrageous quantities of Diet Coke from the chow hall in spite of the derision from my men on such hoarding, then having a 122mm rocket blast apart the giant shipping container that held all of the soda for the chow hall. Yep, you can't buy experience.

Biggest Mystery — How some people can gain weight out here. I'm down to 165 lbs. Who has time to eat?

Second Biggest Mystery — if there's no atheists in foxholes, then why aren't there more people at Mass every Sunday?

Favorite Iraqi TV Show — Oprah. I have no idea. They all have satellite TV.

Coolest Insurgent Act — Stealing almost $7 million from the main bank in Ramadi in broad daylight, then, upon exiting, waving to the Marines in the combat outpost right next to the bank, who had no clue of what was going on. The Marines waved back. Too cool.

Most Memorable Scene — In the middle of the night, on a dusty airfield, watching the better part of a battalion of Marines packed up and ready to go home after over six months in al-Anbar, the relief etched in their young faces even in the moonlight. Then watching these same Marines exchange glances with a similar number of grunts loaded down with gear file past — their replacements. Nothing was said. Nothing needed to be said.

Highest Unit Re-enlistment Rate — Any outfit that has been in Iraq recently. All the danger, all the hardship, all the time away from home, all the horror, all the frustrations with the fight here — all are outweighed by the desire for young men to be part of a band of brothers who will die for one another. They found what they were looking for when they enlisted out of high school. Man for man, they now have more combat experience than any Marines in the history of our Corps.

Most Surprising Thing I Don't Miss — Beer. Perhaps being half-stunned by lack of sleep makes up for it.

Worst Smell — Porta-johns in 120-degree heat — and that's 120 degrees outside of the porta-john.

Highest Temperature — I don't know exactly, but it was in the porta-johns. Needed to re-hydrate after each trip to the loo.

Biggest Hassle — High-ranking visitors. More disruptive to work than a rocket attack. VIPs demand briefs and "battlefield" tours (we take them to quiet sections of Fallujah, which is plenty scary for them). Our briefs and commentary seem to have no effect on their preconceived notions of what's going on in Iraq. Their trips allow them to say that they've been to Fallujah, which gives them an unfortunate degree of credibility in perpetuating their fantasies about the insurgency here.

Biggest Outrage — Practically anything said by talking heads on TV about the war in Iraq, not that I get to watch much TV. Their thoughts are consistently both grossly simplistic and politically slanted. Biggest Offender: Bill O'Reilly.

Best Intel Work — Finding Jill Carroll's kidnappers — all of them. I was mighty proud of my guys that day. I figured we'd all get the Christian Science Monitor for free after this, but none have showed up yet.

Saddest Moment — Having an infantry battalion commander hand me the dog tags of one of my Marines who had just been killed while on a mission with his unit. Hit by a 60mm mortar. He was a great Marine. I felt crushed for a long time afterward. His picture now hangs at the entrance to our section area. We'll carry it home with us when we leave in February.

Best Chuck Norris Moment — 13 May. Bad Guys arrived at the government center in a small town to kidnap the mayor, since they have a problem with any form of government that does not include regular beheadings and women wearing burqahs. There were seven of them. As they brought the mayor out to put him in a pick-up truck to take him off to be beheaded (on video, as usual), one of the Bad Guys put down his machine gun so that he could tie the mayor's hands. The mayor took the opportunity to pick up the machine gun and drill five of the Bad Guys. The other two ran away. One of the dead Bad Guys was on our top twenty wanted list. Like they say, you can't fight City Hall.

Worst Sound — That crack-boom off in the distance that means an IED or mine just went off. You just wonder who got it, hoping that it was a near miss rather than a direct hit. Hear it practically every day.

Second Worst Sound — Our artillery firing without warning. The howitzers are pretty close to where I work. Believe me, outgoing sounds a lot like incoming when our guns are firing right over our heads. They'd about knock the fillings out of your teeth.

Only Thing Better in Iraq Than in the U.S. — Sunsets. Spectacular. It's from all the dust in the air.

Proudest Moment — It's a tie every day, watching our Marines produce phenomenal intelligence products that go pretty far in teasing apart Bad Guy operations in al-Anbar. Every night Marines and Soldiers are kicking in doors and grabbing Bad Guys based on intelligence developed by our guys. We rarely lose a Marine during these raids, they are so well-informed of the objective. A bunch of kids right out of high school shouldn't be able to work so well, but they do.

Happiest Moment — Well, it wasn't in Iraq. There are no truly happy moments here. It was back in California when I was able to hold my family again while home on leave during July.

Most Common Thought — Home. Always thinking of home, of my great wife and the kids. Wondering how everyone else is getting along. Regretting that I don't write more. Yep, always thinking of home.

I hope you all are doing well. If you want to do something for me, kiss a cop, flush a toilet, and drink a beer. I'll try to write again before too long — I promise.

 

Third Time

 Peggy Noonan

-Peggy Noonan


America may be ready for a new political party.
 

Something's happening. I have a feeling we're at some new beginning, that a big breakup's coming, and that though it isn't and will not be immediately apparent, we'll someday look back on this era as the time when a shift began.

All my adult life, people have been saying that the two-party system is ending, that the Democrats' and Republicans' control of political power in America is winding down. According to the traditional critique, the two parties no longer offer the people the choice they want and deserve. Sometimes it's said they are too much alike--Tweedledum and Tweedledee. Sometimes it's said they're too polarizing--too red and too blue for a nation in which many see things through purple glasses.

In 1992 Ross Perot looked like the breakthrough, the man who would make third parties a reality. He destabilized the Republicans and then destabilized himself. By the end of his campaign he seemed to be the crazy old aunt in the attic.

The Perot experience seemed to put an end to third-party fever. But I think it's coming back, I think it's going to grow, and I think the force behind it is unique in our history.

This week there was a small boomlet of talk about a new internet entity called Unity '08--a small collection of party veterans including moderate Democrats (former Carter aide Hamilton Jordan) and liberal-leaning Republicans (former Ford hand Doug Bailey) trying to join together with college students and broaden the options in the 2008 election. In terms of composition, Unity seems like the Concord Coalition, the bipartisan group (Warren Rudman, Bob Kerrey) that warns against high spending and deficits.

Unity seems to me to have America's growing desire for more political options right. But I think they've got the description of the problem wrong.

Their idea is that the two parties are too polarized to govern well. It is certainly true that the level of partisanship in Washington seems high. (Such things, admittedly, ebb, flow and are hard to judge. We look back at the post-World War II years and see a political climate of relative amity and moderation. But Alger Hiss and Dick Nixon didn't see it that way.) Nancy Pelosi seems to be pretty much in favor of anything that hurts Republicans, and