The Nationalist Nation
By Cassandra Atkins, NatParUSA
columnist
The Social
Experiment: Mass Manipulation
Seemingly innocuous
scholars funded by generous government grants to analyze segments of
society to learn, say, voting habits via mindless questionnaires
mailed out, for you to fill out. Not filling them out is an
indication of habits.
For decades advertising agencies
[ 1 ] have been hiring psychologists, anthropologists and
ethnographers to evaluate the consumer populace.
I have found it ironic that some of
the most eloquent writings on this issue are written by Jews
themselves (Adorno – see below). Some very much oppose this type of
manipulation and some who pursue this with the larger sinister plan
in mind.
In order to overcome the consumer
mindset I feel it important to understand how we got here.
Psychology has never been as important as it is today.
If we citizens take a
step back and turn off that idiot box for one night [2] [3] we might
start thinking about what we’re doing, not just ourselves, but what
we are really doing (or not doing) for our children and community.
Ok, you say, man is she out there.
I’ve heard it all before, yet think about it. What do you really
think about?
Do we, White Nationalists, give
ourselves the time to think about how our individual actions on a
daily basis help our cause? In my case maybe I think too much. Yet
all this research has allowed me to feel comfortable in becoming
active for the Nationalist Party. I look ‘outside the box’ more
than staying in the box. It’s easier now. The truth of our
situation is easier to see. It is logical.
From outside the confines of the
politically correct you begin to see that PC thinking isn’t normal.
Independent thought becomes clearer. Our own thoughts come into
focus. This is when action becomes easy.
The stranglehold however is quite
strong. We’ve had the mindset of ‘keeping up with the Jones’ rammed
into our brain for so long that we can’t even keep up with
ourselves. Think about it. If you weren’t so busy trying to get
that Mercedes SUV what else could you be doing? Would we Americans
know what to do with ourselves with about 15 extra hours a week to
spend on ourselves and family? It’s true, the researchers that be
have calculated within hours how much extra time we really need to
be more active for our own benefit. What if you made a decision to
work closer to home so that you didn’t have that three hour
commute? You could probably eat better, become more active with
your children’s schooling OR become seriously active in your local
politicals.
Yet those who want control of
America are counting on the fact that we don’t understand that just
a few more hours a week will give us time to contemplate where we
are at, personally and politically.
Convincing our kind to turn off
that box and think for themselves will be a major hurdle of
reclaiming our rightful destiny. Intellectual freedom, without it
our individuality as a person and collective community is
suppressed.
Manipulation in whatever form it
takes is a subliminal depressant.
The New World Order is counting on
the ‘sheep’ to remain in slumber.
1.
Theodor Adorno
2.
Television & Health
3.
http://www.umass.edu/sareo/PP_S95_HSCN.html
I chose this link to
give you an example of the methodology used in surveys. While
they aren’t all the same, for those of you unfamiliar with this
topic this report is easily readable.
Wilson Key
Athabasca University
Freedom Isn’t Free
Censorship and Secrecy
By Cassandra Atkins, NatParUSA
columnist
The Feminist Agenda:
A Fatherless
America
When I started this article my focus
was on statistical data of marriages and divorces beginning in the
sixties. However, I have now come to the conclusion that what
should really be brought out is the mental state of the women who
are lauded as the movement’s leaders. [ 1 ]
The lies, fraudulent or out of
context statistics and what seems to me complete hysterical ranting
of women who should have gone under the knife and gotten a sex
change operation, have changed the course of women’s involvement in
society and promoted the unreasonable expectation that they can have
it all.
Having it all means the high powered career; matrimonial bliss;
beautiful, well adjusted children and a clean, orderly home.
And they are
having it all, at the expense of the taxpayer;
a
poverty stricken global village.
[ 2 ]
To begin with; here are the titles to books I’ve gotten for my
research: Simone De Beauvoir – A Critical View; The Sexual Division
of Work; The World Split Open (good choice of words); The Bitch in
the House (by a woman); and of course Gloria Steinem – Her Passions,
Politics, and Mystique. Oh – I forgot one Andrea Dworkin’s
‘Intercourse’. I actually didn’t read it. I’m not interested in
pornography. What a piece of work she was.
Read at your own risk!
The above list
is the one I choked on to read. It was all the same rhetoric.
Then of course
there are the pages and pages of statistical data.
Feminist fantasies by Phyllis
Schlafly, Fatherless America by David Blankenhorn and Domestic
TRANQUILITY by F. Carolyn Graglia are by far the most well thought
out, critical books of the bunch. Their argument against feminism
is so well documented that only those in serious denial that they
are women can refute their argument.
I would recommend that every woman
and man pick one or all of these books, (Schlafly’s, Graglia’s and
Blankenhorn’s ), up and at least read a few chapters. Feminist
fantasies is a very fast read. Domestic TRANQUILITY is more
involved, and Fatherless America is excellent.
Find your library
Why is it important that we learn about this,
I ask again; because without strong male influence our young boys
turn to aggressive and violent behavior, which is disruptive to a
functioning society. [
3 ]
The selfish ideology of women today
harms the children that they bear.
The feminist agenda has created a
matriarchal society where men have become sublimated and
frustrated. This has caused men to be confused. Part of this
confusion is what researcher’s term, paternity uncertainty.
With the advent of the pill promiscuous sex has proliferated. A man
today can’t be sure if the pregnancy has been propagated by his
self, even in a so called monogamous relationship; unless of course
he is in a loving and committed relationship.
Two studies finally stopped me from
this research
Headstart and a report, Father Hunger, from
James M. Herzog, assistant psychiatrist at Harvard Medical
School.
The crisis of a fatherless society
affects everyone. If we are to form a cohesive political party we
will need both sexes for guidance. Women need to understand that
they can’t have it all. Most important, women need to understand
that once they have children the family must come first, and that
means material sacrifice and a commitment to giving children a two
parent family.
A last and final statement from my
reading is this: Many women have gotten where they are today with
the help of men.
- Justice
Ruth Bader Ginsberg
- From NOW:
National Organization for Women. http://www.now.org/issues/economic/welfare/093003poverty.html
-
http://www.wisconsinfathers.org/twoparents.htm
Interesting information This link talks about UN gender
specific legislation.
UNICEF Study Never in any of these studies is child poverty
linked to fatherlessness.
In none of the main stream reports
that I went through was fatherlessness brought up as a factor in
child poverty. Only in the numerous books I read, which were
thoroughly documented statistically, was fatherlessness,
conclusively correlated with child poverty.
It’s Time to Re-Examine the Funding Allotted to Gays
Today the headlines that you won’t see in mainstream
media, and for good reason, it is so heinous that it might make you
throw-up. I will not even repeat it in the article; I will link it
at the bottom if you dare to read it.
Our society has become so perverse that we must
stand up for common decency.
Cramming down our throats; the advocates of Gay and
Lesbians are seeking the mandate that our children be forced,
in school, to accept the lifestyles of these perverts. The
ultimate defilement and degradation of our society is at stake.
Do you want your children to accept the fact that it
is ok to practice bestiality?
Where is the outrage? Of course it is too soon, I
just read about it myself.
A sickness has taken over the American society. What
makes it even more horrific to me is that it happened not far from
where I live. Nestled in the outskirts of an upscale area in
Enumclaw, Washington is a private ranch where the sickest of the
sick go for ‘enjoyment’.
I have written all my
state representatives telling them that I will find a way to
stop paying my taxes because I’m tired of supporting sick gays who
have made a conscience decision to perform their perverted acts.
They choose this lifestyle and we are footing the bill. I have
written a letter to the editor of the Seattle Times Newspaper. I
have e-mailed everyone I know urging them to find a way to stop or
reduce the taxes that they pay.
Gays know that there is a safety net out there,
funded by federal and state taxes. These benefits include extensive
drug coverage for aids related illnesses and housing benefits when
they become to sick to afford their own. Taxpayer funded
agencies cover almost the total cost afforded to those infected with
HIV/AIDS; they are: Medicare, Medicaid (the largest provider) [1],
Aids Drug Assistance Programs [ADAP], Ryan White CARE Act programs.
The Family Research Report (I highly recommend reading their
journal) [2] estimates that the average medical cost for
infected homosexuals is $5,560 per year, compared to the average
cost of non-homosexual males per year is $1,700. Overall the
estimated tax dollars per year, per taxpayer that fund HIV/AIDS
infected homosexual’s amounts to $359. They call it the ‘gay-sodomy
tax’.
As citizens we have the right and obligation to fight
for the decency of our society. We must show our outrage. We must
stop supporting our elected officials. The Kaiser Family Foundation
shows the
current budget before congress for fiscal year, FY, 2006, this
price includes Aids funding for 3rd world countries.
Let this be a "Wake-up" call to everyone- this is not
an exclusive issue, it can happen anywhere.
Our elected leaders who support these animals are no
better than those they support. In this case it is people who
practice bestiality.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002382718_horse15m.html
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000981095
1.
Graydon, RT Medicaid and the HIV/AIDS epidemic
in the United States, Health
Care Financing Review , 2000; 22:117-122
2.
Journal of the Family Research Institute
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRR_04_03.html
3. The Kaiser Family Foundation
http://www.kff.org/
By Cassandra Atkins, NatParUSA
columnist
The Leadership
Uncompromising and unpopular, these are just
two adjectives that come to mind when
thinking about what it takes to be a
leader. I will use different adjectives to
describe today’s political leaders; lying,
unethical, by any means necessary, vipers.
(Of course all politicians don’t fit into
this definition, but the ones who control
our lives do)
ethic … 1 pl but sing or pl in
constr: the discipline dealing with what
is good and bad and with moral duty and
obligation 2 a: a set of
moral principles or values b: a
theory or system of moral values c
… the principles of conduct governing an
individual or a group d: a guiding
philosophy
_____________________________________________________________
discipline
… 4 : training that corrects, molds
or perfects the mental faculties or moral
character … c : self control
_____________________________________________________________
moral
… 1 a: of or relating to principles
of right and wrong in behavior : ETHICAL < ~
judgments> …
_____________________________________________________________
uncompromising
… : not making or accepting a compromise:
making no concessions: inflexible,
unyielding
_____________________________________________________________
Merriam
Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 1996.
Common
among these definitions is the; dealing or
relating to, of issues good and bad, right
or wrong. These are issues of morality.
Today’s definition of good and bad; right or
wrong has been altered to benefit our
current ruling class here in the United
States.
As a
whole the decisions (Medicare)
made for us by our current leaders
do not benefit us citizens, as a
whole (1,2), and some are in direct
violation of the
US Constitution, Amendment V.
The
ethical foundation that these decisions were
based on is suspect.
Once again,
We the People of the United States are being
put in a position of having to take
revolutionary action to regain our
constitutional rights.
Some
of President Bush’s highest paying
contributors stand to gain billions of
dollars of revenue from the newly reformed
bills. The lobby and law firm of Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feldhas (Robert
Strauss, founder)
represent some of the largest companies
in the U.S. Akin Gump et al. is one of the
president’s largest contributors AND
lobbyist for the Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America. It goes without
saying; or is a logical assumption; these
companies are helping shape governmental
policy. Is it right that they are? They are
making millions off the American populace,
legally. Is it wrong? Absolutely. It is
wrong because our legislators voted with
them, the lobbyists. If our elected
officials and their assistants took the time
to research the bills they were voting on
they might have seen the truth and voted for
it. Our elected officers’ morals now come
into question.
The latest
decision regarding
eminent domain is such a blatant misuse
of power by the Supreme Court. I wonder if
Justice O’Conner is stepping down now
because the all out assault on the U.S.
Constitution now sickens her. When these
rulings are viewed as a whole, all of these
decisions bring our Justices and elected
officials' morals and motivations for
passing them up for questioning.
Once
again, We the People, you, me and every
other displaced, downsized and alienated
Legal American citizen will have to fight
the powers that be for our rights on our own
soil. What we do or don’t do will seal the
fate for generations to come. What will
this fate be?
Consider
the issue of the lost manufacturing base.
As we succumb to a
consumerist society our ability to
support ourselves lowers. Lost or lower tax
revenue base effects the educational,
medical and infrastructure systems. The
standard of living drops with the lowering
of wages. Service based industries pay far
less than the typical living wage of
manufacturing jobs which have been
out-sourced or off-shored. Is it realistic
to boycott all the industries that have gone
off-shore? (3)
Action we
take must be in the political realm. But
how to get there without being put in jail?
(Enemy
Combatant, US Patriot Act II)
Revolutionary measures must be taken. We
must seize, replace or impeach the governing
officers by electing members who believe in
the founding doctrine created by
US Constitution and
Bill of Rights. The subversion of these
two documents is cause for a civilian
up-rising. But a majority of people who
should be interested in these rights don’t
seem to care or are too tired to care.
Special interest groups now do the speaking
for many Americans. (LaRaza,
Gay Rights) Our actions alone point to
this fact, where is the up-rising?
Stepping
forward in today’s political environment is
uncomfortable to most. John Stuart Mill in
his treatise, On Liberty, gives a
resounding argument about the obligation
that we, as individual citizens, must give
back to society that which afforded us these
liberties.
Those who
understand the consequences of facing our
now totalitarian
regime will set the pace, show others
that it can be done and give people the
empowerment which we desperately need to
begin our revolution.
Leaders that come forth are bringing up
issues that Americans don’t want to face.
Un-compromising, un-popular, yet ethical,
our new leaders know that they will probably
be giving their lives in exchange for
justice and returning to the people once
more their given rights as stated in the
Bill of Rights, set forth in the American
Constitution.
1.
NAFTA
2.
Cafta
3.
WTO
restrictions and policies regarding the US
steel industry
**************************************
By Cassandra Atkins, NatParUSA
columnist
Nationalism:
Are European Americans Willing to Commit?
What is it about Nationalism that most people
don’t understand? The truth be told they don’t
want to get it. To speak that word in relation
to politics conjures up unpleasant thoughts and
images. In hushed tones it is spoken about. An
ideology that has become synonymous with one
epoch of western history, when in fact Europe’s
past is filled with regimes that espoused
Nationalism, even in extremes. Nationalism is an
exciting topic to discuss. Depending on where or
whom you talk to about it with you can either
have an interesting debate or better yet get
hauled off to jail!
In America today there is a growing segment of
the population who are now learning what
Nationalism is. These people are making a
conscience effort to understand its political
significance. When applied directly to their
personal, societal and governmental needs;
Nationalism becomes a viable governmental
structure. Let’s make no assumption here about
which segment of the population I’m discussing,
it is the European/Anglo Saxon American.
Blind Faith, Manufactured Consent or Rule of
Law.
What can I say? There are segments of the
American populace who cannot or will not admit
that America is a dying country. Years of
relying on television for information has
softened this entity into pawns of megalith
corporations whose goal has been neatly
accomplished. Politicians with slick campaign
ads promising fixes to their problems or that
have swindled these soft people. They are soft
of mind and of body. Not all are soft. The
recent duping of the largest lobby group in
America comes to mind: the AARP. They fell for
the swindle lock, stock and barrel. I have no
sympathy for them. What I do have is hope that
this situation opened the way for those more
active within their organization to consider
alternatives being offered them. In my opinion,
this older generation (what is left of them
after we discount those wasted away on
medication) are sorely needed for guidance. Yet
one thing stops me from having much hope, it is
their blind faith to a regime that they are now
defending with their lives.
The generation next in line is as far as I’m
concerned a lost cause.
My generation – the 35 to 45 age group
(approximate age range) is right now or can be
the deciding force which gives Nationalism a
chance to succeed in America. We still have
youth’s energy and had a not too adulterated
education to know that something is very wrong
and it needs to be fixed. What we don’t have is
knowledge of true psychological and physical
warfare, in all its ugly manifestations. The
generations below us have not the discipline to
understand chain of command. Sorry guys.
Leadership comes in many forms. Within the White
community today, its leaders see the need for
and are being asked to step forward to protect
its particular concerns. I see no lack of
leaders, what I do see is the subjugation of our
leaders by today’s regime. Threats, ‘accidents’
and false incarcerations strike fear, thus
causing activism to remain in the hands of the
so-called fringe groups.
The fear that the current administration has of
our White Nationalist movement is increasing, so
is the rate of White incarceration. David Duke
and Matt Hale are two high profile examples of
false imprisonments. The average middle class
American sees the cause of a White Nationalist
movement as a threat to their so-called secure
world. This secure world however is crumbling,
crime against Whites, the higher medical
payments due to the uninsured, underinsured,
influx of illegal immigrants and job loss due to
shipping of once blue collar jobs overseas are
but just a few examples related to current
government policy that is threatening
middleclass America. I would state here that
there are many statistics available to back up
any claims I put forth, therefore because of
space restrictions I will leave investigation up
to the reader.
Fringe groups are a question within our own
community, why? Those familiar with history,
especially history of war know that these groups
are needed at every level to secure our goal.
The softness of a populace that has never
experienced war and few left who have are at an
impasse. Without a central leadership who is
willing to recognize these basic truths are
slowing down our progress. Now it is true that
many feel that the time isn’t right, maybe it
isn’t, yet how long will we wait for action? My
question at this point is who does it benefit
within the White Nationalist movement to wait?
Engineered and well constructed; a movement can
withstand resistance. Yet who will engineer this
movement? Can we White Nationalists wait until
there is nothing left to build up from? It would
seem that some in the movement are waiting for a
signal. It would seem that those who have the
charisma and ethical determination to see this
done right are themselves waiting for consent.
Manufactured consent will breed our own leaders
out of existence. Is this a bit too esoteric for
you?
Is Nationalism a social construct? Some aspects
of it are. But there are also many strata that
define it. Ethnic, Romantic and Cultural
Nationalism are quite similar in regards to
societal make-up of peoples included. It becomes
murky when the construct only considers the
governing political body. The Isles of Britain
are a good example. Today, the year 2005,
Britain has become a wasteland of non-native
residents. The political regime is trying to
accommodate these alien people; this comes at
the expense of native Englanders. This is the
perfect example of Civic Nationalism, which is
based solely on the participation of its
citizenry. Now if they all had a common goal
maybe the government would work. Here in America
we can see the beginnings of this turmoil. Will
our social construct allow the tearing down of
court houses to accommodate other people’s
beliefs because the word ‘God’ is written on
their edifices?
Writers of the U.S. constitution; European/Anglo
Saxon Americans, Christian men, George
Washington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas
Jefferson (to name several) never intended that
our constitution be perverted to the point that
it has been today. You think I’m going too far?
I recently came across an article:
A resolution - H.J. Res. 11 - is pending that
proposes to repeal the 22nd amendment of the
U.S. Constitution, thereby removing the
limitation on the number of terms an individual
may serve as President.
Read the resolution at
http://thomas.loc.gov and type H.J. Res 11
into the search box. The resolution is now
before the House Judiciary Committee
What will happen if such a scenario comes to
fruition? Many of you reading this know where
it’s headed those of you who do not know should
consider the term dictatorship.
Nationalism as we White Nationalists believe it
will be a conscience choice. Well thought out
and designed with one purpose in mind; to give
us a choice on how we want to be governed, what
types of educational systems to implement for
the betterment of our White brethren and much
more.
But the Rule of Law is becoming a shadow. And
how can it not strike fear in our citizenry when
our nefarious rulers are building mega prisons
to house us. Enacting new laws that label even
the most innocent as ‘enemy combatants’, this is
disconcerting at best. How far will we allow
this Rule by Law to continue? Our freedom of
speech alone can land us in jail.
What will be the catalyst that brings US,
White Nationalists, into the sunlight?
|
|
