A South African Perspective

Before I start my article, I wish to point the reader's attention to the numbers lettered after each paragraph. IE. (1). These numbers are registered, to show the source of the statements listed according to number.

South Africa's increasing tension.

It's been 11 years of Democracy in South Africa, and it's time that we evaluate whether or not it has actually been beneficiary to South Africans.

Both Economically and Socially South-Africa has been on a steady decline, with the current policies of "Black Economic Empowerment" (BEE).

This quota-system is referred to by the "Minorities" as a necessity to reverse the effects of racism, One Mr. Vuyo Mbuli made a statement on SAFM on 11 June to the effect that it is necessary to discriminate against the white youth of today

in order to address the imbalances "created by Apartheid". This process however has absolutely nothing to do with reversing effects of so-called "racism" it has everything to do with implementing legislation which restricts the whites influence in this nation. This legislation called "BEE" works to the same effect as the Affirmative action legislation, under-skilled individuals take up occupational seats in large companies without the slightest bit of experience. I ask you now, how is this a benefit to any one?

Is this legislation not racist in itself? Is the words uttered by Mr. Vuyo Mbuli not blatant racism in itself? Mr Mbuli practically admitted that even though they are the majority in this country it is a necessity for them to displace the white youth of South-Africa. (1)

THE CORRUPTION OF OUR GOVERNMENT.

Before I start on the corruption of the Communist Regime in South Africa, I would like to point out a few general misconceptions about Mr. Mandela and the Apartheid regime.

There is a common misconception that Mr. Mandela was locked up under the "racist regime" of Apartheid because he dared to protest against it and they swiftly denied him his freedom of speech.

This is incorrect, Mr. Mandela had admitted to possession of fire arms as well as sabotage, in this article the admittance is stipulated very clearly "In 1963 the imprisoned Mandela and several other men were tried for sabotage, treason, and violent conspiracy in the celebrated Rivonia Trial, named after a fashionable suburb of Johannesburg where raiding police had discovered quantities of arms and equipment at the headquarters of the underground Umkhonto We Sizwe ("Spear of the Nation," the ANC's military wing). Mandela had been a founder of the organization and admitted the truth of some of the charges that were made against him" (2).

Now let us start with the continuous trend of Corruption among our "Intellectuals" the political faces of South-Africa, I present to the reader here, an article written concerning the funds harnessed by Mrs. Mandela during her reign as head of the African National Congress Women’s League.

Madikizela-Mandela was convicted of 43 counts of fraud and 25 of theft involving $120,000 from the African National Congress Women’s League, which she heads. But outside the court, “Madikizela-Mandela was met by a group of about 30 students, chanting ‘Viva Winnie viva,’ with raised fists. Madikizela Mandela smiled at the group and raised her fist.” (AP, April 24, 2003)

Winnie’s prominence and political significance raises the general issue of South Africa’s future. During the apartheid era, South Africa’s elites saw the country’s future as being part of the West, which they felt irrationally kept them aside. Both the Afrikaans speakers who supported the system and their English-speaking opposition tried, or pretended to try, to follow Western patterns.

The idea was that South Africa, a Commonwealth member (if suspended) that enjoyed cooperative relations with the United States, etc., was part of the vaguely defined “West.” The non-elite view of the country’s future, radically represented by groups such as the quasi-Maoist Pan-African Congress, saw the country as part and parcel of the Third World in Africa (whatever that continental demarcation might mean), and were thus opposed to all that is Western and “exploitative.” (3)

Jacob Zuma.

Zuma was dismissed as deputy president in June after he was charged with corruption, His former financial adviser, Schabir Shaik, was found guilty in June on charges that he paid Zuma about $195,000 for political favors and brokered a bribe from a French arms firm. But this wasn't the end of the line where Mr. Zuma is concerned, he was charged of late for the abuse (Rape) of a female.(4)

Of course Mr. Zuma likes to pretend that he is innocent, but the law will determine whether or not it is actually the case. For any political individual to be involved in so much scandal, and so much corruption is beyond words or even explanation.

Membathisi Mdladlana.

South African labour minister, Membathisi Mdladlana, said in Zimbabwe on Friday that this country had a lot to learn from President Robert Mugabe's program of land reform.

The minister of labour hailed the process of "Land reformation" in Zimbabwe, stating that they have allot to learn from this cruelty and murder, now some people might consider this a sly remark, but when in Africa serious note there of should be taken.  (5)

I urge the reader to see for themselves what it is that he is actually hailing, take note if you are squeamish this is a highly graphical article. http://www.white-history.com/zimbabwe/zimbabwe.htm

As the reader can see, this Government in South-Africa doesn't want to "reverse" the effects of so-called "racism" but rather seeks to permanently displace the whites of South-Africa.

Shown here:

"We will kill the whites, all of them; Afrikaans and English," rioting Pasma students and their leaders at the university's Mamelodi campus chanted.

Pasma spokesperson Mametlwe Sebei said they had tried to remain peaceful in their protests but this had proved fruitless.

"We will become violent with the rightwing student groups and will fight the Afrikaner groups with fire and blood."

"We will take violence to all the white students and their lecturers and to any other bodies which do not support our movement and its demands,"..(7)

This is the type of blatant hatred that every White in South-Africa has to endure everyday.

Now the reader might ask, "what does all this have to do with the NatParUSA?"

I had spoken to you before, about the effects of cultures, the strong ones that determine the fate of the weak one's, the more whites attack their own culture in America, the more room they give another to dominate it's fate.

Aside of alerting the reader of the situation in Southern-Africa, this is a caution and a look into what the future will bring for America should it continue in the trend it is today. End immigration, before it ends America as you know it.

This brings me to my next article, the effects of a "Global economy" on the first class countries.

GLOBALISM.

The elite would like you to believe that a Global economy is the "Humane" thing to do, and that the exploitation and exportation of American business is to the benefit of third world countries, to uplift societies all over the world. You might find the opposite quite shocking. In this news article, the United states hit an immigration high, as well as an increase in poverty, The center said there are 35.2 million immigrants in the United States, of those, Camarota said, "45 percent of immigrants and their young children live in or around the poverty threshold." (6)

Now before we get the violin started here, let me explain what this actually means, this means with the "Global economy" and the relative ease in which access is granted into the United States, that the poor from already impoverished nations, migrate to the United states of America and increase the poverty level of the first class country in itself, now we are forced to ask ourselves if Globalism was meant for the purpose of uplifting third world countries, why is it that the first world countries are increasing in poverty?.

The answer is simple, Globalism is creating an exponential decrease of societies, it's intent was to equal the class of society around the globe, if that intent was to create a poor world, then it is steadily succeeding.

As the article shows these immigrants are for the most part un-educated, is this a pro for America? Of course not, they bring their social problems to your doorstep, this has everything to do with my warning above.

It is time for Americans to stand up and call for a cease of this madness, your children will not have a future if you don't stand up and fight for it. Change your vote while you're still a majority!.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

 

Sources.

1) http://www.strauss.za.com/hip/affirmative_racism.html#vote1

2) http://www.britannica.com/nobel/micro/371_88.html

3) http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=7514

4) http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/africa/12/06/zuma.rape/?section=cnn_world

5) http://www.mg.co.za/articledirect.aspx?area=%2fbreaking_news%2fbreaking_news__national&articleid=14240

6) http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200512\NAT20051213a.htm

(7) http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=vn20050219103803315C822723#jump

 

 

 

 

The Natural Politics of the Nationalist

Josef Wolfgang, NatParUSA Columnist

 

 

The Negative impact of Affirmative Action in our Society.

Since the 1960's Two party systems gradually implemented this detrimental program aimed solely on displacing the White worker from his rightful workplace.

By displacing the Qualified white worker with unqualified minorities we ensure very little for our future, the work sector will not improve if individuals have a lack of education and experience in the work sectors, Two party systems implements an artificial ideology like 'affirmative action' in order to replace the white worker with minority groups.

Affirmative action on a daily basis employs non Whites without qualification above whites with qualifications, It lessens the average white mans influence in America both economically and politically.

Is this what we want the future of America to be? Do we want our children to be denied an occupation because a criteria has to be filled?

The argument that Affirmative Action aids white Females.

It is with most certainty that I state some female individuals upon reading this, might feel skeptical since Affirmative action claims to be for the Female as well, but is it really?

Many times I have come across this statement, The answer is a resounding no.

Did anything really change for the woman since "affirmative action" put the female in the doctrine? some 7 years after its initial implementation ?,No the woman of today share the same things as they had 40 years ago, woman had the choice back then whether to work or not or to marry or not, there really is no fundamental change.

White woman were merely implemented to give a larger support base for the doctrine, not that many white woman actually received any benefit from this specific policy.

Nowhere does affirmative action indicate a single ounce of aid to anything other than Colored Minorities, affirmative action is and always will be nothing more than a black advancement program.

Public opinion polls show that between half and three-fourths of whites believe that, as a group, they are routinely discriminated against. A 1999 poll, commissioned by the Seattle Times, found that 75% of whites agreed with the statement saying that 'Unqualified minorities get hired over qualified whites' most of the time or some of the time. Two-thirds said the same about promotion and 63% said the same about college admission.

Loving Your Culture.

Culture is of benefit in and of itself. Cultural activities, in whatever form, enrich the lives of their participants and of the community as a whole. These activities, whether music, literature, dance or football, allow people an outlet for their creativity and self-expression which they may not have through work or domestic duties. They have a value beyond pure monetary and utilitarian measures. They also offer far more.

The historic environment of the Country; its buildings, landscape and settlements, was created through cultural and social change. It makes statements about the culture of the Country and expresses its local distinctiveness. It helps us to understand the cultural distinctiveness of our nation and contributes to the development of culture in the Country. Engaging with history is a cultural activity in itself which has local benefits.

Embracing and loving our culture should not be looked at as an evil, but a way of life, by denying ourselves the right to be proud of our achievements, only causes us to lose ground.

In a Nationalist perspective, our nature and our culture, play a key role in our society, it acts as a pillar for our foundations, without it our society cannot withstand much.

Natural Nationalism does not believe in downplaying your own culture, to benefit the cultures of foreign entities, I had mentioned before what happens when cultural relativism occurs within a nation, there is a continuous play for the dominant culture, even in a multicultural society.

I took the liberty of Explaining the meaning of Natural Nationalism and Natural laws, for those who wonder what I stand for.

The Definition of Natural Nationalism and Natural Laws.

 

-Natural Laws, are laws or bodies of laws that derives from nature and is believed to be binding upon human actions apart from or in conjunction with laws established by human authority.

-The Natural laws theory is that some laws are basic and fundamental to human nature and are discoverable by human reason without reference to specific legislative enactments or judicial decisions. Natural law is opposed to positive law, which is human-made.

-Natural Nationalism is a firm belief that Nature chose our boundaries and that we should live within them through natures laws, the common laws of nature compels us toward a form of nationalism.

Feelings of nationalism are a country's source of strength, without which it is destined to disintegrate. Western Europe's efforts to unite for example, are a clear indication that the nationalistic sense in each of the individual Western European nations is in the process of crumbling or at least weak. Western Europe is seeking to revitalize itself by creating a political nationalism that can take the place of a non-existent deep-rooted nationalism.

 *********************************************************