|
|
|
|
NatParUSA Contributing Authors
_______________
|
|
|
A Pretty Fiction Indeed - By Win Vanderstyne
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines equality as; the quality or state of being equal: as a : sameness or equivalence in number, quantity, or measure b : likeness or sameness in quality, power, status, or degree. By that definition the masses would have you believe that all humans, be they whatever race are entitled to equal “rights”. Having personally defined a 'right' as that which one (or a group) has taken earnestly, it is that there could never be "equal rights" among the different races. The Negroes may have fought by our side to defend our new found America from Britain, but they did so under their own agenda. The waves of third world immigrants that plague our shores day by day weren’t there at all! Nor were their ancestors. So what right should they have in our country? It is true that every man, woman and child on our Earth are made up of 99% (actually fractions more) the same genetic code. However it is also a proven fact that Homo sapiens and chimpanzees share 98.3% of the same genetic code. When put in perspective that less than 1% doesn't seem so insignificant does it? There is no such thing as equality, except in instances of mathematics. There is only one set of laws that are true and unbreakable, by any means. Those are the laws of nature. The laws that have proven time and time again that the strongest should and shall prevail. This is demonstrated throughout the world every day from our animal kingdom to our "justice" system. From Earths great histories, to our Superior Aryan race. Fictional equality may be the format for the torturous government of our country today, but I find it extremely hard to digest that this America is what our dear forefather Thomas Jefferson had in mind when he penned the words "We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal...” If these truths were to be self-evident than why didn't Jefferson free the slaves? It lies in those two words alone that his statement did not include the equality of non-whites. For it is evident, that we (whites) had to lower our standards of living (and continue to) for all of the non-whites to be included in our nation. So what is self evident by this fact of the matter is that the races shall never be equal. Yet still, there are greater injustices that have been forged upon us in this, the age of the Equality Revolution. Let us focus for a moment on the 'men' parts of Jefferson's statement, for it stands that sexual equality is no exception. It too is painted, a pretty fiction by the liberal Jewish mass media. Since the sexual revolution women have "escalated" to the same standard as men. However in most circumstances the standard for women had to be lowered for them to be included. For example, US Army Regulation 600-9 states that male soldiers in the age range of 21-27 years old are required to have no more than 22% body fat. For female soldiers of the same ages the requirement is 30%. This may be an adherence to women's different chemical make up, but I ask, how is that beneficial? Another example from the same Army Regulation is that women 58 in. tall (4’10”)/ 112 lbs can be enlisted into the Army. A man has to be 60 in. (5’) tall or over to be considered. The same in-equality is present (by the same article) in that males of 72 in. tall (in the same age group) must weigh 195 lbs. Females 72 in. tall are only required to weigh 172 lbs. Is that the definition of equality? Shouldn't a woman that is going to be performing the same tasks as her comrades be of the same standard? I fully understand that some women are very capable of accomplishing some of the tasks that men are capable of and vise versa. I also understand that some women are totally incapable of some of the traditional roles of women and likewise for men. However it is stated in nature that men and women are not equal. Not better or worse by any means. Just not equal. There will forever be differences, not solely in appearance, but in chemical composition, thought patterns and sexual organs, (to skim just the surface) that can never be equalized. Always there will be roles that men and women can never switch. Most evidently, men will never be able to birth a child, nor will a female ever be able to fertilize an egg. There it stands that men and women are little more than parts of a whole. The two parts alone, though they may act and exist apart, will never truly prosper without each other. Males and Females together form the most perfect unification in the universe. The unity that creates life, the unity that creates true love, the unity that secures the existence of our people and a future for white children. None of the world could survive without this beautiful union. Without these differences all of mankind would cease to exist. My question now is, where did we so suddenly come up with this idea of sexual equality? After so many hundreds and thousands of years of women having their own specific roles and duties at which their capability exceeds that of a man, did some woman somewhere jump up and say "STOP EVERYTHING! This is wrong!” Just to reiterate, there are instances out of the norm in every circumstance in life. Some women may be / are better than some men at some of the traditional duties of men and some men better than some women at some women's traditional duties. But basis for civilization does not render to these few instances. It has and will stand in the truest laws of nature that we are merely parts, dependent upon each other for perpetual survival. Lets face it fellas, we live in the twenty-first century and women won the right to vote almost 100 years ago (1920). Women have made great contributions to the government, economy and general way of life in our country since 1920 (and well before). But when these women went out into the workforce and started having to pay attention to politics and all the things that came with the responsibility of equal rights of men, who was there to pick up the roles that they were now in some way, however insignificant, neglecting? When Sarah went to John in the late 1920's and said she wanted to go out and get a job, did John say, "Ok honey, I'll quit my job and stay home take care of the kids and cook dinner." *If you answered yes to this question you are most likely not in touch with reality* :) No, John most certainly did not say any such thing. If John even gave his wife permission to get a job, he most certainly did not offer to stay at home with the children. (Yes I said permission. Until fairly recent years it was customary at Catholic and Protestant weddings for the grooms’ vows to include to love and honor his wife, while the brides’ vows were to love honor and obey her husband.) Now my question is what happened to little Suzie and John Jr. when they came home from school and both mommy and daddy were hard at work. There are obviously a very wide array of answers to this question, but none as comforting as coming home to the love, warmth and guidance of a caring parent. Dinner comes later. More outside influence is put on the child along with less parental supervision, which more often than not leads to delinquency rather than upstanding behavior. Though man had existed it its ways for thousands of years, the twentieth century has brought us to turmoil. In the twenty-first century we need to remember that no matter what, we do each have our roles in life that are essential to our survival. For about a century now we have some of our most brilliant and talented women caught up in the "feminist revolution". Saying things like it is not their “responsibility” to get married and have children. They are ensuring their total demise all according to the mess the Jewish media has been feeding our women for far too long. We will loose their beauty, their genetic intelligence and all the rest of their wonderful traits because they think they don't HAVE to go through the “burden” of being a parent. It is truly a shame. It is our RESPONSIBILITY to have children. It is truly the only way our race, or any, will survive. The “others” seem to have grasped the concept, producing illegitimate future criminals at record speed. Whites have the absolute lowest birth rate in America, (11.7 per thousand population – average per state in 2002) even lower than “American Indians”, (13.8, 2002). Hispanic birth rate (22.6, 2002) is just shy of double whites, IN OUR COUNTRY! Black births number higher than whites in almost every state in the union. Only in Idaho, Montana, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia do we out weigh blacks in this sense, and even in these states whites still do not have the highest rates. For population growth each white couple must have at least 3 children. (2 children per family would be stagnancy, for 2 children “take the place” of each parent and the actual population, in numbers, would remain the same.) Race mixing and low white birthrate are leading us to extinction. We are becoming a minority in our own country. In 1995 the only 2 majority non white states in the union were Hawaii and New Mexico (along with the District of Columbia). California joined those ranks in 2000 with the white population being 48%, down from 53% in 1995. California is also the most populated state in our union, accounting for 12% of our countries total population. We are the path ladies. Our men can't do it without us, neither can we without them. Now ladies, I’m not saying go quit your job and get pregnant tomorrow. We are needed in all of society. We have strengths that our counter parts lack, strengths that have led to many great things through out all history. Also, in these days double incomes are sometimes needed to survive. What we must not forget is that building strong white families is the only sure way to preserve our race and heritage. "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children,” David Lane’s immortal 14 Words. Raise our children to uphold and truly understand the immutable laws of nature. Teach them to be honorable and have pride in themselves and our true people. In all Whites lies our history and heritage and the natural instinct (however suppressed) to live by the ways our ancestors meant for us to. We need to understand that our traditional roles as Men and Women are as much a part of that heritage and history as the sacred blood we share.
|
|
